The sparse additive model (SpAM) offers a trade-off between interpretability and flexibility, and hence is a powerful model for high-dimensional research. This paper focuses on the variable selection, i.e., the univariate function selection problem in SpAM. We establish the minimax separation rates from both the perspectives of sparse multiple testing (FDR + FNR control) and support recovery (wrong recovery probability control). We further study how adaptation to unknown smoothness affects the minimax separation rate, and propose an adaptive selection procedure. Finally, we discuss the difference between estimation and selection in SpAM: Procedures achieving optimal function estimation may fail to achieve optimal univariate function selection.

Sparse variable selection improves interpretability and generalization in highdimensional learning by selecting a small subset of informative features. Recent advances in Mixed Integer Programming (MIP) have enabled solving large-scale nonprivate sparse regression--known as Best Subset Selection (BSS)--with millions of variables in minutes. However, extending these algorithmic advances to the setting of Differential Privacy (DP) has remained largely unexplored. In this paper, we introduce two new pure differentially private estimators for sparse variable selection, levering modern MIP techniques. Our framework is general and applies broadly to problems like sparse regression or classification, and we provide theoretical support recovery guarantees in the case of BSS. Inspired by the exponential mechanism, we develop structured sampling procedures that efficiently explore the non-convex objective landscape, avoiding the exhaustive combinatorial search in the exponential mechanism. We complement our theoretical findings with extensive numerical experiments, using both least squares and hinge loss for our objective function, and demonstrate that our methods achieve state-of-the-art empirical support recovery, outperforming competing algorithms in settings with up to p = 104.

Dynamics of interacting systems in engineering, society, and nature often evolve over latent networks that govern which entities can interact. We study the problem of inferring these networks from event-based observations, which arise naturally in finance, seismology, and neuroscience. While there is substantial algorithmic work addressing this important problem, theoretical results are scarce. In this paper we ask the following fundamental question: what is the minimum time that one must observe the dynamics in order to exactly recover the underlying network, as a function of the number $d$ of interacting entities? For a class of stationary Hawkes processes with sparse, weak interactions, we prove that an observation time of order $\log d$ is sufficient and necessary. For the upper bound we construct a two-stage estimator that uses clipped and binned event data for screening, followed by a least-squares refinement, and apply concentration bounds derived from the Poisson cluster representation. For the lower bound we combine Fano's inequality with Jacod's Girsanov formula for point processes on a suitable subclass of networks.

Neural Information Processing Systems http://nips.cc/

Neural Information Processing Systems http://nips.cc/

This paper studies the problem of sparse regression where the goal is to learn a sparse vector that best optimizes a given objective function. Under the assumption that the objective function satisfies restricted strong convexity (RSC), we analyze orthogonal matching pursuit (OMP), a greedy algorithm that is used heavily in applications, and obtain support recovery result as well as a tight generalization error bound for OMP. Furthermore, we obtain lower bounds for OMP, showing that both our results on support recovery and generalization error are tight up to logarithmic factors. To the best of our knowledge, these support recovery and generalization bounds are the first such matching upper and lower bounds (up to logarithmic factors) for {\em any} sparse regression algorithm under the RSC assumption.

Neural Information Processing Systems http://nips.cc/

SLR, but an explicit connection between the two had not been made.

The premise of semi-supervised learning (SSL) is that combining labeled and unlabeled data yields significantly more accurate models.